Many large US employers use applicant tracking or recruiting platforms to store, search and route applications. Their configurations differ, so there is no single universal ATS score to beat. The practical goal is a clean, parseable resume whose truthful evidence is easy for both software and recruiters to find.
The dominant US ATS platforms
| Platform | Common users | Key characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Workday | Large enterprises, financial services, healthcare, Fortune 500 | Very structured parsing — favors standard section headings. Two-column layouts often fail completely. |
| Taleo (Oracle) | Large corporations, government contractors, global companies | Older system with strict parsing rules. Dates must be in consistent format. Graphics cause complete failure. |
| Greenhouse | Tech companies, startups, fast-growth companies | More modern parsing. Better at semantic matching. Still struggles with complex formatting. |
| iCIMS | Mid-market, healthcare, financial services | Good keyword matching but sensitive to formatting. Tables in main content area can disrupt parsing. |
| Lever | Tech companies, scale-ups | Modern, generally good parsing. LinkedIn import option reduces resume parsing importance. |
| USAJOBS (federal) | All federal government agencies | Plain text preferred. 2-page limit enforced for most positions. Very keyword-dependent. |
Why resumes fail ATS — the most common causes
1. Two-column layout
This is the single most common cause of ATS failure for US resumes (Forbes, 2026). When text is arranged in two columns, most ATS parsers read left-to-right across the full page width — mixing content from both columns into incomprehensible text. Your experience from column A gets merged with skills from column B. The parsed document becomes gibberish to the system.
Fix: Single column layout throughout. Test by copying your resume text into Notepad — if it reads clearly in the correct order, the layout is more likely to parse cleanly in many ATS platforms.
2. Tables used for main content
Tables (even simple two-column tables) are frequently misread by ATS systems. The parser reads table cells sequentially, often in an order that doesn't match the visual layout. A table with dates in the left column and job titles in the right becomes scrambled when parsed.
Fix: Remove all tables from the main content of your resume. Line-by-line text with consistent formatting is the safe alternative.
3. Headers and footers
Content placed in Word headers and footers (your name, contact information, or page numbers) is frequently missed entirely by ATS parsers. If your name is only in the header, the ATS may not know whose resume it is.
Fix: Put your name and contact information in the main body of the document, not in a header or footer.
4. Non-standard section headings
Standard section headings make a resume easier for recruiters and many parsers to categorise. Creative labels such as “My Journey” can make the structure less obvious.
Fix: Use standard US section headings: "Professional Summary," "Work Experience" or "Professional Experience," "Education," "Skills" or "Core Competencies," "Certifications."
5. Graphics, images, and icons
Resume graphics such as skill bars, photos, logos and decorative lines add little searchable evidence and may be ignored by parsers. Keep essential information in selectable text.
Fix: Text only. No images, skill bars, graphs, logos, or decorative elements.
6. PDF formatting (image-based vs text-based)
Some PDF creation tools produce image-based PDFs rather than text-based PDFs — the resume looks normal visually but recruitment software may have no selectable text to extract. This is particularly common with scanned PDFs or resumes designed in Canva or similar visual tools exported directly to PDF.
Fix: Export to PDF from Word or Google Docs (produces text-based PDFs). Test by selecting and copying text in the PDF — if you can copy the text, it's text-based. If you cannot select text, it is image-based and is a poor choice for systems that need to extract text.
Keyword alignment — accurate terminology matters
ATS and recruiter-search workflows vary by employer and configuration. Some rely heavily on terms from the job posting, while others use broader search or semantic features. The safest approach is to make genuine matches easy to recognise without changing the meaning of your experience:
- Read the job posting carefully and identify the specific skills, technologies, and qualifications explicitly listed
- Use the posting's exact terminology in your resume wherever your experience genuinely matches
- Include both spelled-out terms and abbreviations where applicable: "Search Engine Optimization (SEO)" rather than just "SEO"
- The skills/competencies section at the top of your resume is particularly ATS-weighted — keyword-dense, precise, and tailored to each application
- Do NOT keyword stuff with terms that don't reflect your actual experience — this is immediately apparent to human reviewers
Sources: Forbes — ATS Resume Format 2026 (August 2026); Merit America — ATS Resume Tips 2026; ResumeAdapter — 2026 Resume Trends report; Scale.jobs — One vs Two Page Resume ATS Analysis 2026; USAJOBS application guidance (usajobs.gov, 2026)
Tailor your US resume in a few minutes
JobTailoring helps tailor your resume to the role using US spelling, clear formatting and evidence grounded in your supplied experience. Paste any LinkedIn or Indeed posting and get a tailored resume and cover letter in a few minutes.
Start free — 1 complete application